翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ In re Aimster Copyright Litigation ・ In re Alappat ・ In re Amway Corp. ・ In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data ・ In re Bilski ・ In re Boucher ・ In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation ・ In re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation ・ In re Debs ・ In re DoubleClick ・ In re Dube ・ In re Electronic Privacy Information Center ・ In re Estate of Gardiner ・ In re Ferguson ・ In re Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC ・ In re Gateway Learning Corp. ・ In re Gault ・ In re Gill ・ In re Guardianship of Kowalski ・ In re Hayes ・ In re Himmel ・ In re Kansas Indians ・ In re Kasinga ・ In re Lowry ・ In re Madden ・ In re Marriage Cases ・ In re Marriage of J.B. and H.B. ・ In re McUlta ・ In re Neagle ・ In re NLRB Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク In re Gateway Learning Corp. ： ウィキペディア英語版 In re Gateway Learning Corp. ''In re Gateway Learning Corp'', 138 F.T.C. 443 File No. 042-3047, was an investigatory action by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of the Gateway Learning Corporation, distributor of Hooked on Phonics.〔''In re Gateway Learning Corp'', 138 F.T.C. 443, File No. 042-3047 (2004). Copies of the Septemter 2004 Complaint, Decision, and Order are available at: http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0423047/0423047.shtm.〕 In its complaint, the FTC alleged that Gateway had committed both unfair and deceptive trade practices by violating the terms of its own privacy policy and making retroactive changes to its privacy policy without notifying its customers.〔See Complaint, paragraphs 11 – 16, available at: http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0423047/040917comp0423047.pdf.〕 Gateway reached a settlement with the FTC, entering into a consent decree in July 2004, before formal charges were filed.〔See Consent Decree, available at: http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0423047/040707agree0423047.pdf.〕 ==The Federal Trade Commission's Statutory Authority== The core regulatory mission of the FTC is to promote and ensure consumer protection and to prevent anti-competitive business practices.〔See Federal Trade Commission, Wikipedia Article, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Trade_Commission.〕 The consumer protection authority the FTC relied on in this action against Gateway Learning Corp was derived from Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive trade practices.〔See Enforcing Privacy Promises: Section 5 of the FTC Act, available at: http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/privacyinitiatives/promises.html.〕 These two specific prohibitions, unfairness and deception, represent two distinct prongs of the FTC's consumer protection authority under Section 5.〔See Enforcing Privacy Promises: Section 5 of the FTC Act, available at: www.ftc.gov/privacy/privacyinitiatives/promises.html.〕 Historically, the FTC has tended to allege deception in its consumer protection actions.〔See Gateway Learning Settles Privacy Charges, for article quoting FTC officials commenting on the investigation, available at: http://directmag.com/mag/marketing_gateway_learning_settles/.〕 This action against Gateway is notable in that the FTC alleges both deception and unfairness.〔See Gateway Learning Settles Privacy Charges, for article quoting FTC officials commenting on the investigation, available at: http://directmag.com/mag/marketing_gateway_learning_settles/; and see Complaint at paragraph 16.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「In re Gateway Learning Corp.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.